HOUSTON SEXUAL ASSAULT BOMBSHELL – DEFENDANT OLAGUNDOYE’S “KINGHAVEN” ATTORNEY QUITS?

These developments may have changed the dynamics of the case and equally could have impacted Mr. Chukelu’s latest decision, it was gathered. Inset: Olushegun Olagundoye, owner or President of Kinghaven Counseling Group is being sued for $1,000,000.00 by a former employee for sexual assault and battery.

A proposed order for withdrawal of counsel for defendant Olushegun Olagundoye’s Kinghaven Group is awaiting Judge’s endorsement as of press time.

International Guardian – Houston, TX – Documents recovered from the Harris County District Clerk (Cause No.2016-33668 – EZENAGU, NKEOMA BRENDA vs. OLAGUNDOYE, OLUSHEGUN B -Court 151) reveal that a proposed order is awaiting court’s endorsement following a motion to grant a withdrawal of Mr. Patrick Chukelu as counsel to defendant Olushegun Olagundoye’s Kinghaven Counselling Group. 

Olushegun Olagundoye, owner or President of Kinghaven Counseling Group is being sued for $1,000,000.00 by a former employee for sexual assault and battery – an allegation he is fighting with two attorneys. Mr.  Patrick Chukelu is the counsel Kinghaven Counseling Group, whereas  Sean Greenwood is standing in for Olushegun Olagundoye.

Mr. Chukelu has in his withdrawal motion opted to shield his reasons under a preserve of attorney-client privilege. However it is not clear if some latest developments in the case prompted Mr. Chukelu’s unanticipated withdrawal. For instance, International Guardian publisher, Dr. Anthony Obi Ogbo after his deposition, September  by the defense, had expressed concerns in writing to all the attorneys of record, over what he called “breach of confidentiality, betrayal of trust, and unprecedented measures of two-facedness” by Attorney Chukelu in Olugundoye’s case.

See withdrawal motion >>

In a grievance memo recently filed, and now pending in the State Bar of Texas, titled ““violation of confidentiality of Information; engagements of Conflict of Interest; violation of Duties to Former/Present Client by Attorneys: Patrick Chukelu and defense-partner, Sean Greenwood,” Dr. Ogbo had cited an unethical collaboration between Mr. Greenwood and Mr. Chukelu over using confidential information about his news outfit acquired by Mr. Chukelu as his long-term attorney to benefit their ongoing defense partnership.

Similarly, attorney to the plaintiff, Ms. Anne Gbenjo in a motion to compel Kinghaven ‘s responses to plaintiff’s interrogatories, request for production of documents and for sanctions, cited Mr. Chukelu’s conflict in the case, questioning the legitimacy of his representation. See Motion to Compel >>>

These developments may have changed the dynamics of the case and equally could have impacted Mr. Chukelu’s latest decision, it was gathered.

⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔⇔

The legal brawl started around the middle of 2016 when Olushegun Olagundoye was sued for $1,000,000.00 by Ezenagu for sexual assault and battery. The petition shows three causes of action, namely; Assault Battery, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Violation of Texas Labor Code/Laws. In his responses, Olagundoye generally denies all of Plaintiff’s claims against him. According to the petition, shortly after Plaintiff commenced employment at Kinghaven, “Defendant Olagundoye, subjected her to horrendous and repetitive incidents of sexual assault and torture as he repeatedly ordered her to report to his office to perform sexual acts on the floor of his office. When Plaintiff rebuffed Olgundoye’s advances and expressed her concerns over the acts, Olagundoye told Plaintiff that there was nothing to worry about as he had a procedure done to his penis that makes him unable to impregnate a woman.” Read the entire story: Houston: Nigerian socialite sued for rape and battery >>>

Late last year, documents recovered from the Harris County District Clerk (Cause No. 2016-33668 – EZENAGU, NKEOMA BRENDA vs. OLAGUNDOYE, OLUSHEGUN B -Court 151) revealed a 56-page document titled “Plaintiff’s Medical Record and Recording Submitted by Defendants in Discovery” revealing as exhibits, both a bombshell recorded lengthy phone conversation involving   Olagundoye and presumably one of a mistress, and a detailed medical record of his accuser. Click to see Publication: >>

Trial has been set for February 19, 2018. If the case has not been reached by the second Friday after this date, according to Court document, “the trial will be reset.”

Olushegun Olagundoye’s sexual assault lawsuit – Bombshell audio, medical records may validate battery allegations

shegun001lead

In the tape, Olagundoye often bragged that “I’m a millionaire here in America” and at some point said, “If I put my thing inside you, that’s special to me, that is valuable.”

Latest filed documents recovered from the Harris County District Clerk (Cause No. 2016-33668 – EZENAGU, NKEOMA BRENDA vs. OLAGUNDOYE, OLUSHEGUN B -Court 151) revealed two major bombshell exhibits that might validate allegations of sexual assault and battery made by a former employee, Ezenagu, Nkeoma Brenda against his former employer, Olushegun Olagundoye, owner or President of Kinghaven Counseling Group.  Olagundoye is being sued by Ezenagu for sexual assault, and battery – an allegation he totally denies in several responses.

But latest developments revealed a 56-page document titled “Plaintiff’s Medical Record and Recording Submitted by Defendants in Discovery” revealing as exhibits, both a bombshell recorded lengthy phone conversation involving   Olagundoye and presumably one of a  mistress, and a detailed medical record of his accuser.

download_pdf_use

In the tape, Olagundoye often bragged that “I’m a millionaire here in America” and at some point said, “If I put my thing inside you, that’s special to me, that is valuable.” According to the documents, the recording referenced eight paragraphs (48 to 56) in the Amended Petition of the plaintiff.

To listen to the tape recording, click the below icon. The tape/transcripts  contains very obscene remarks, and readers’ discretion is highly advised.

 

The unedited full tests of the paragraphs involving the recorded message in the amended are as follows:

EXCERPTS – PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED PETITION (para 48-56).

CAUSE NO. 2016-33668 (Chris Daniel – District Clerk Harris County)

  1. Additionally, in Olagundoye’s quest or attempt to show that he did not rape the Plaintiff, Olagundoye’s attorneys, Patrick Chukelu and Sean Greenwood submitted to the Plaintiff’s counsel, a recording of Olagundoye’s conversation with a married woman, with whom Olagundoye had an affair. She is one of the Plaintiff’s sisters. The affair seemed to be in respite at the time of the recording, which was shortly after Plaintiff’s separation from Kinghaven, and after Olagundoye had received Plaintiff’s resignation letter, described above.
  2. The recording submitted by Olagundoye’s attorneys, Patrick Chukelu and Sean Greenwood reveals that Olagundoye contacted the married woman, (hereinafter called “Woman”) and asked her to see him. She did. They both sat in Olagundoye’s car during the over one hour conversation recording3.
  3. Around the beginning of their conversation, Olagundoye asked Woman whether Plaintiff truly had a degree in accounting. When Woman answered in the affirmative, Defendant stated “Are you sure?” Woman again responded in the affirmative. Olagundoye told Woman that Plaintiff did not know about accounting or mathematics or anything and that she no longer worked at Kinghaven. He went further to tell Woman that “I don’t mess with my staff” and that Woman could not work for him because they were in a relationship; that Plaintiff “tried all kind of stuff” to go out with him but that he rebuffed all of Plaintiff’s sexual advances.
  4. Additionally, in the recording, Olagundoye told Woman that Plaintiff “lies a lot, everybody in the company knows she’s a liar, she chases men.” Woman responded, “I honestly don’t know about that part of her.” Olagundoye responded “YOU DO, YOU DO, TRUST ME I KNOW YOU DO, YOU DO, YOU DO.” Olagundoye proceeded multiple times to say Plaintiff “lies a lot,” that Plaintiff “lies about your family”; “she sleeps around and she admitted it”; that Plaintiff once asked him to be with both Plaintiff and Woman; that Plaintiff told him she dated white men and liked sex with white men. Olagundoye made these and other derogatory comments about Plaintiff in the recording. Woman repeated that she did not know that part of her sister, the Plaintiff. Olagundoye again responded “YOU DO, YOU DO.” He then told Woman not to divulge their discussion to Plaintiff. Olagundoye also told Woman that Kinghaven had wanted to fire Plaintiff a long time ago but that he did not allow it.
  5. Moreover, the recording Olagundoye’s lawyers forwarded to Plaintiff’s counsel revealed that Olagundoye wanted to recrudesce the relationship but Woman resisted. Woman told Olagundoye that their affair was a mistake she made and that she would “never do it again.” Olagundoye responded inter alia that: “if I put my thing inside you, that’s special to me, that is valuable.” The Woman resisted again and Olagundoye told her that she was at poverty level; that he “could do significant things” for her. The Woman persisted in resisting Olagundoye’s advances; Olagundoye went further to say “I’ll take care of you, and take care of all your needs.” The Woman responded “I don’t need it.” Olagundoye said “you have kids and they are your responsibilities. Don’t be stupid.”
  6. In the same recording, the Woman told Olagundoye she regretted what she had with him and that for a long time she could not sing in church as she felt that she had betrayed herself. Olagundoye called her name 3 times and said he would take care of her and there is opportunity for her; that he enjoyed being with her and that he “enjoyed her moves.” Once again the Woman continued to resist Olagundoye’s advances; and he responded “Look at you, you’re so pretty.” He went on to promise to set aside funds for her and that “anything you need I’ll take care of it. I say I want to buy you a car.”
  7. Similarly in the same recording when Woman resisted Olagundoye’s advances for the 20th (twentieth) time within the one hour period, Olagundoye told her again that he would take care of her, bragging that “I’m a millionaire here in America.” The Woman got tired of Olagundoye’s importuning her and said “I have a husband.” Loudly, Olagundoye responded “yes you have a husband but you cannot live at poverty level.”
  8. In fact on twenty-four different occasions in the recording, the Woman gave one reason or the other why the relationship should not continue and that she did not need the relationship. Olagundoye persisted and said “I’d never cared about any woman the way I cared about you. I know you gave me something special.” He went on to say that God told him that Woman was his responsibility, and that he was going to take care of her4.
  9. Outside of that, the recording revealed that, while he was having an affair with Woman, Olagundoye also took Woman’s best friend, CH, another married woman to a Guest House, which appeared to be where Olagundoye and Woman spent time together. Unbeknownst to Olagundoye, Woman drove behind them when he took CH to the Guest House and Woman found out enough to believe Olagundoye slept with CH. When Woman inquired about the subject, Olagundoye denied ever having an affair with CH; told Woman that CH borrowed $1,500.00 from him to purchase a car; and that he issued the check directly to the car dealership. When Woman began to talk about Olagundoye’s wife, he insisted that it was his sister. Woman asked to see the pictures in his wallet; Olagundoye responded “I don’t carry pictures.”

———————————————————-

To listen to the entire tape recording, click the below icon. WARNING: The tape contained very obscene remarks, and readers’ discretion is highly advised.

LISTEN TO FULL AUDIO

♦ Editor’s note: For detailed information, including all motions, responses, and exhibits regarding this case, please visit Chris Daniel – District Clerk Harris County and search with Nkeoma Brenda Ezenagu vs. Olushegun B. Olagundoye (CAUSE NO. 2016-33668).

 

 

Let’s Be Clear: Donald Trump Bragged About Sexual Assault

By Mark Joseph Stern

The Washington Post released a stunning video on Friday that captured Donald Trump bragging about his sexual exploits in 2005. “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful [women],” Trump said. “[I] just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.” The Post described the clip as an “extremely lewd conversation” about “kissing” and “groping,” framing the story as a shocking report about his vulgar language. Other outlets adopted this angle as well.

That is an odd way to frame this revelation, because what Trump describes in the recording is, quite literally, criminal sexual assault.

Sexual assault statutes vary state by state, and we don’t know where the alleged conduct occurred. But consider the sexual battery statute in California, where the conversation in question took place. Under that law, any person “who touches an intimate part of another person” for his own sexual gratification and without the victim’s consent has committed sexual battery. He is punishable by up to six months’ imprisonment. Or consider the law in New York, where Trump lives. There, an individual is guilty of a sex offense if he “forcibly touches the sexual or other intimate parts of another person for the purpose of degrading or abusing such person, or for the purpose of gratifying the actor’s sexual desire.” A person found guilty of this sex offense risks imprisonment of up to one year. In Connecticut, where Trump long maintained a vacation home, the law is similar: An individual is guilty of sexual assault when he “subjects another person to sexual contact without such other person’s consent.” (“Sexual contact” need not even involve the touching of “bare skin.”) Again, an individual convicted of this form of sexual assault faces up to a year’s imprisonment.

Trump boasted of kissing women and touching their genitals without their consent. In much of the country, including those states in which Trump lives and works, that is sexual assault. And if he was telling the truth on tape, he could have been prosecuted and imprisoned for a considerable amount of time. That should be the story we discuss this weekend—not the acceptability of his “locker room banter.”

 Mark Joseph Stern is a writer for Slate. He covers the law and LGBTQ issues.

English Teacher Charged With Sexual Assault of a Student: ‘You’re My Baby Boo!’

Judicial-System-Uses-Affluenza-Unfairly

A Wisconsin high school teacher is facing charges of sexual assault following an alleged sexual relationship with a student, including on the night of her husband’s bachelor’s party.
Sara Domres, a 29-year-old former teacher at the New Berlin West High School, was charged last week for sexual assault of a student by school staff following an alleged relationship with a 16-year-old lasting approximately ten months.

937c6b88acfca53cce45ed7e084590ff
Sara Domres, a 29-year-old former teacher at the New Berlin West High School, was charged last week for sexual assault of a student.

According to the criminal complaint, the sophomore was in Domres’ English class, where they became fast friends, and texted each other frequently, the police report stated.

During their relationship, lasting between April 2015 and January 2016, they reportedly exchanged over 1,100 messages. One of the many text messages said, “I love being your baby boo. (heart emoji) run away with me!!! I want you forever,” according to the criminal complaint.

According to the police statement, the boy was allegedly “a virgin prior to having sexual intercourse” with the teacher.

One of the counts she is being charged with was for an encounter in Domres’ car in a park-and-ride lot in July, according to the criminal complaint. The boy was 16 at the time.

The other count she is being charged with responded to their encounter in a Motel 6, where she had paid for a single bed with cash, and it was discovered that the boy’s phone was connected to the WiFi on the same day, authorities said.

According to police, a message was sent the night before: “You’re extremely attractive to me!!! I can’t wait for our night we are doing it no matter what!!!”

However, the boy as well as witnesses reportedly told the police that the couple had sex more frequently than the two instances. According to WISN, they even had sex on the night of Domres’ now-husband’s bachelor party.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that Domres was married in August, in the midst of her relationship with the student.

The police report also said that the couple had passed handwritten notes “of a sexual nature” to each other. One of them allegedly read: “I want to do you (smiley face) NOW!!”

According to a police report, three juveniles reported the relationship on January 16.

Police later uncovered multiple Internet searches from the student’s phone from the previous day, the police report stated. One was a Yahoo search for, “how to delete a sent snapchat?” Another was a google search for “what evidence does a judge need to charge a teacher with sexual assault.”

The school had reportedly discovered the relationship sometime in January and she was immediately let go. Domres was released on $1,000 bail following the arrest, on the condition that she has “no contact with victim/witness/and family members, New Berlin West High School, students or staff listed in the Criminal Complaint,” the Wisconsin Circuit Court noted on their website.

She has pleaded not guilty to the charges, and her next hearing is on May 4. Her attorney has not yet provided a comment.

x Close

Like Us On Facebook