President Buhari: between foreign policy and overseas excursions

BHR AIR ROUTES FB
Satiric composition of President Buhari’s travelling routes. Buhari has consistently been hooked on his presidential jet, trotting the globe, and making official stopover calls to just about any foreign city that has an airport; and taking photos with any foreign public officer or leader that cared. So what does this mean to a country currently overwhelmed by a burden of economic and political adversities?
By Anthony Obi Ogbo
By Anthony Obi Ogbo

President Buhari’s penchant for flying around, it may be recalled, started when he was a presidential candidate of the All Progressive Congress (APC). Today, as president, Buhari consistently has been hooked on his presidential jet, trotting the globe, and making official stopover calls to just about any foreign city that has an airport; and taking photos with any foreign public officer or leader that cared. So what does this mean to a country currently overwhelmed by a burden of economic and political adversities?

Here is a Commander-in-chief who chooses to remain on the air making rounds of unsubstantiated escapades while his country’s security system  remains in unexplained tatters. In the North where President Buhari hails from, casualties of suicide bombings are a horrific trend, while communal mobility is grounded for scarcity of fuel. Ever since Mr. President made himself the overseer of the Petroleum Minister, the Nigeria’s oil and gas industry has gone in a terrible coma; contractors wander around a blind system whereas motorists struggle in vain to buy petrol.

Within this prevailing devastation, here is Garba Shehu, Senior Special Assistant to President Buhari on Media and Publicity, responding to his travelling obsession:

Garba Shehu, Senior Special Assistant to President Buhari on Media and Publicity
Garba Shehu, Senior Special Assistant to President Buhari on Media and Publicity

“President Muhammadu Buhari came into office under the mantra of change. While Nigerians are yearning for change, you need someone who will set up the infrastructure, both at home and abroad for it. President Buhari is busy doing that. The change is manifest in where he visits and what he does.”

This again is where President Buhari’s handlers got it wrong – an inability to differentiate between effective foreign policy and aimless foreign excursions. Foreign policy is basically a government’s strategy in dealing with other nations. Buhari, since his inauguration had shuttled Islamic countries to show appreciation to foreign Muslim leaders who secretly funded his campaign. He had equally made unreported trips for medical reasons; whereas other trips were aimlessly planned and yielded nothing but photos albums for social media campaign – so how does change manifest from this documentary of unreasonable oversea trips?

Nigerians who initially supported this president expected that his trips would have galvanized foreign assistance and collaboration to defeat the Boko Haram overpowering insurgency. Unfortunately, President Buhari’s trips are unproductive while he exaggerated his military’s success against the terror group, claiming they had long been defeated. But the group are an intractable agony, executing their butcheries with little or no challenge from the government forces. Just a week ago, 24 worshipers were killed and 18 were wounded after two female suicide bombers detonated explosives inside a mosque.

The major question is on how Buhari’s voyage addiction would translate to effective foreign policy. The foreign policy process is very diplomatic and must galvanize power to protect and project Nigeria’s global interests – not create a forum for several trips, executive dinners, and fanfares. President Buhari must seek diplomatic interests with the appropriate countries to strategically create opportunities to solve his country’s surmounting issues on security, economy, and a continued derail of the social system. Consequently, he should collaborate with global leaders passionate about uniting the country rather than his current foreign cronies – some controversial sectarian extremists unconcerned about a peaceful Nigeria.

Selective Justice is Injustice

By Anthony Obi Ogbo
By Anthony Obi Ogbo

Fairness is the most abused leadership concept, especially in regions where the judicial system is subjugated by totalitarian headship. Martin Luther King, Jr. was absolutely right, that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. But the current approach of President Muhammadu Buhari of Nigeria in cleansing his country of corruption makes a mockery of his designation, and indicates a lack of knowledge in managing moral philosophy in the public sector.

For instance, both President Buhari’s Party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), and the opposition, The People’s Democratic Party ran their respective presidential elections with public funds, improperly diverted and converted them to campaign coffers. Former national security adviser, Sambo Dasuki, allegedly diverted and apportioned more than 2.2 billion dollars to politicians and campaign needs. Similarly, former governor of Rivers State, Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi who headed President Buhari’s campaign fund-drive allegedly stole more than 70 billion Naira from his state to finance his Presidential race. Mr. Dasuki is currently facing trial, whereas Mr. Amaechi is rewarded with a ministerial position.
To make it worse, President Buhari in his dictatorial fashion had defied court’s order that granted bail to Mr. Dasuki, and strong-headedly ordered his re-arrest.  In his own words, here is the reason; “If you see the atrocities these people committed against this country, we can’t allow them to jump bail.” For clarity, this is the President talking – not the prosecutor. In other words,  besides making himself the overseer of Petroleum Resources Ministry, the Buhari has also become the Attorney General and Minister of Justice.
At the moment, all judges report to him, and all court rulings or judgements are screened in Aso Rock before delivery.
Yet we must not forget that failure of elected officers to abide by the rule of law is the height of indiscipline and misconduct. So, how could President Buhari fight corruption by abusing the judicial arm – violating court orders, and terrorizing judges? How does crowding  jailhouses with suspects whose rights of legal representation are suppressed create an effective ethical culture? How could an executive team consisting of the most corrupt politicians in the country  influence decency in the public service system?
There is absolutely nothing wrong with fighting corruption in a country where dishonesty in the system is devastating, but hiding behind a so called “war against indiscipline” to profile individuals in the most tyrannical style is reprehensible. Nigeria is a country where every single public officer, including the President has a looting record. Singling out individuals or parties as scapegoats may not fix the structure, but may amorally implant a retaliatory culture in the governance system.

At the moment, all judges report to him, and all court rulings or judgements are screened in Aso Rock before delivery. Yet we must not forget that failure of elected officers to abide by the rule of law is the height of indiscipline and misconduct.
At the moment, all judges report to him, and all court rulings or judgements are screened in Aso Rock before delivery. Yet we must not forget that failure of elected officers to abide by the rule of law is the height of indiscipline and misconduct.

Pragmatically, overhauling massive ethical lapses in the public sector requires relevant legislations to discourage corrupt attitudes and gradually reform the system with effective moral culture. Administration of justice is the firmest pillar of government. Unfortunately, a suppression of the judicial arm in Nigeria leaves a hopelessly corrupt leadership structure.
Take for instance, the 2010 case of a Former United States representative, William Jefferson of Louisiana.  Rep. Jefferson, infamous for having $90,000 in bribe money hidden in his freezer, is serving a 13-year prison sentence after being convicted on a slew of federal corruption charges. However, one of the most puzzling and intriguing aspect of the case is that Jefferson’s partner-in-crime, Atiku Abubakar, the vice president of Nigeria at the time was not prosecuted by his country.  Abubakar remained a hero in Nigeria, still treading on public funds and running elections to become his country’s president.
In the United States, The anti-corruption legacy is embedded in the constitution and enforced appropriately. Various provisions in the Constitution deal squarely with corruption, thereby limiting the opportunities for self-enrichment, and permitting impeachment of any officer of the United States, including the President and Vice President, for “Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and Misdemeanors.”
I would say again, that my criticisms of Buhari’s fight against corruption is not an attack on implanting moral decency in the system, but a condemnation of tyranny, discriminatory justice, and suppression of the judicial process. What we have evidenced so far is an angry leader, who in shear execution of his animosity, is clamping down on the opposition under the disguise of wiping corruption in the system. In a true democratic setting, chasing public fund lotters with horsewhips and dictating orders to throw individuals in jail, or denying them bail are definitely not the responsibility of this president. Therefore, we must condemn President Buhari’s prevalent approach to ethical management as a primeval jungle justice; a totalitarian show of senselessness and cruelty.
■  Dr. Anthony Ogbo,  is the President of American Journal of Transformational Leadership. Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Buhari’s abuse and crash of the “Change” Praxis

By Anthony Obi Ogbo
By Anthony Obi Ogbo

Social media discussion threads are swamped with discussions about Nigeria and a latest controversy about the list of ministerial nominees recently made public by its president, Muhammadu Buhari. Majority of the masses almost running out of patience, had waited for almost four months for their new leader to announce his ministerial team, and had equally criticized him for sluggishly sitting down on many issues of national significance. But the Presidency explicitly defended his delays of ministerial nominations, claiming it needed enough time to search for credible people to harmonize with his professed transformation agenda. He had uncontrollably used the term “change” to pacify their justified impatience.

The nation was shocked when the list of ministerial nominees was finally released and sent to the Senate by the Presidency for endorsement. Disgracefully, most nominees turned out to be the same politicians and public officers with accusations of embezzlement, mismanagement, and corruption blurring their records. The issues on political dynamics thus took a new turn, revealing that the President may have lied to the nation when he claimed he was taking his time to search for honest and capable hands.  7e3ddc3808f3d3adf86212776a4c71b9

Another issue provoked by the President’s list centers on the “Change” philosophy affirmed by the President and his party, the All Progressive Congress (APC) as their governance approach. As a campaign strategy, Buhari’s camp had adopted the change mantra as an anthem, wooing their base with chocolate-coated transformation lyrics, and singing themselves into power. But besides a routine abuse of the practice since his inauguration, the President may have finally crashed what was left of in his credibility to fight moral laxity, and the ability to execute a transformation process he professed and paraded as his supervisory forte.

President Buhari’s handle of the country so far has convinced Nigerians across party lines that the regime has no idea what to do with power in a representative process. It is unfortunate that the regime has no blueprint to move their country forward, but are trapped with a President who neither communicates nor collaborates with subordinates but wakes up each day with strange attitude, disagreeing with himself, and pronouncing tactless orders.

Most Nigerians, without doubt are now convinced that this regime has battled unproductively with the perception of the change praxis. Yet, failure in any leadership process, as I have always mentioned, should not be treated as a taboo, but as a learning ground to make amends and proceed. Here again are a few summaries similar to what I presented earlier in the year, during a heated presidential campaign:

■ The first determinant of ‘change’ as a solution is the quality of the proposed transformation. A proposal to fight corruption with corrupt characters is not change, but reveals a total bastardization of the process. In the realm of ethical management, it takes moral people to shape moral society. The names and characters in Buhari’s list do not correspond that philosophy.

■ Change does not mean a rearrangement of managers and positions; it is not about firing workers for poor performance or jailing jobless youth for shop-lifting. It is a science – an embrace of a new paradigm strategically executed to inspire a solid foundation for future developments.

■ A quest for organizational renewal requires a constructive blueprint. A Change expedition without plan is like flying a passenger jet without a satellite-based navigation system. Since its inauguration, the regime has not presented any development outline, while the president singlehandedly made decisions in a dictatorial manner. In a structure supervised by a team of politicians unfamiliar with the dialect of change, the masses must be ready for further surprises.

■ In the complex world of political governance, change does not mean a change of address from Daura to Abuja. It is obvious that the regime does not understand the political meaning of “Change”, but has unwisely shown a biased movement, recycle, and reshuffle of people, positions, and the national resources. This is not “change”, but a systematized smash-and-grab invasion of the nation, its people, resources, and prospects.

Nigeria: executive appointees and diversity management

By Anthony Obi Ogbo
By Anthony Obi Ogbo

Nigerians are boiling in controversy over their new leader’s approach to appointment of ministers and other governmental positions. President Muhammadu Buhari, almost 100 days in office, so far has  appointed mostly indigenes of the North where he hails from to occupy key positions in his regime in a manner that generated a widespread uproar, with critics labelling his actions as “lopsided.”

From many threads that pervade the social media about this issue, one commentator, Rhoda Irodia wrote, “No Southerner is looking for handouts from their Southern representatives, rather we simply want all parts of the whole to be equally represented.” Abubakar Tsav identified as a retired police commissioner echoed a similar sentiment labelling the appointments as unequal. According to Tsav, “Nigeria is too big to have majority of the appointees from one section of the country.  We have competent people in every part of Nigeria. For that reason, Buhari should spread the appointments to every part of Nigeria.”

Most of Buhari’s supporters, however saw nothing wrong with his appointments, arguing that choosing a team of his choice is a part his executive mandate. In fact, one Oladimeji Fabiyi, a member APC told the media that Buhari’s appointments are “wonderful and forward looking.” According to Fabiyi, “There is nothing wrong with it because they leader wants to put people who are going to help achieve the promise they made to the people.” To further support the President’s actions, a news blog, Delta Analyst Online reported how   a pastor in Benin backed the President’s actions saying, “If Buhari appoints a ‘monkey’ as one of those to assist him to bring the change he has promised, Nigerians should support him”.

But Buhari’s actions should have been expected based of his own comments  less than six weeks ago. In a forum in his recent visit to the United State, President Buhari had categorically stated that he would not treat people who did not vote for him equally with those who voted for him. In his words, the President had stated, “Going by election results, constituencies that gave me 97% cannot in all honesty be treated, on some issues, with constituencies that gave me 5%. I think these are political realities.”

So Buhari’s latest disregard of issues of equity and fairness in his allotment of crucial executive positions should not be a surprise, rather a practical execution a proposal he had already put in place. Attorney and legal analyst, Oshiokpekhai Utu-Orbih cited a possible constitutional lapses of Buhari’s appointment as “a total disregard for due process of law and order,” citing Section 14 (3) of the Nigerian 1999 Constitution mandating equity in composition of national government.  Utu-Orbih denounced Buhari’s appointments as a scheme running contrary to the spirit and letters of this constitutional provision, and argued that Buhari’s onslaught on the Nigerian people has surely awaken a new consciousness that could inspire a unity of the Southerners as formidable oppositions.

It may be necessary however, to view President Buhari’s disproportionate executive appointment so far from other perspectives. Besides the provisions of the laws, balancing the workforce in a diverse culture is not just an administrative requirement, but an ethical duty. An uneven work structure amorally leaves an unproductive environment of dichotomy and marginalized populace. Constitution or not, it is ethically erroneous in a population diverse with multiple tribes, cultures, and geographical sectors, to ostracize any group from the leadership or the workforce process.

Demographic trends in contemporary governance leaves three interrelated leadership challenges; cross‐cultural complexities, gender disparities, and diversity management. Without doubt, President Buhari, so far, has failed to recognize the inevitability of these concepts in his stewardship, and repercussions may derail his push for a transformation.   Various studies are a substantiation of the powerful effects of workforce evenness in decision-making effectiveness.  Hence, to progress in his vows to effectively transform his country, President Buhari must embrace a plan that would encompass a judicious composition of the people and relevant demographic arrangements, including; culture, tribes, gender, and geopolitical zones.

In transformation management, especially in a multicultural society, diversity in governmental appointees is a moral mandate not a treat. Using appointment of key public positions to reward campaign supporters, support tribesmen, or punish those considered as “unsupportive” constituents are ethically unjust, spiteful, and may not create the necessary avenues to inspire change.

Furthermore, Buhari’s cohorts must enlighten him on issues of diversity regarding public policy rather than their current self-justifying mentality. A consideration of gender, tribe, age, and geopolitical zones must play a role in structuring the executive workforce to inspire any growth. The electorates or followers who are indeed a core segment of the democratic process are humans who have emotional and psychological needs, and compromising those needs could create resentment and resistance to any transformation agenda. The regime, visibly, is already experiencing such resentments.

Nigeria – Buhari’s 100 days of horror

By Anthony Obi Ogbo
By Anthony Obi Ogbo

It is one thing is to rustle power, but sustaining the challenges require more competencies. Nigerians are still debating the 100-day season of their new regime with critics bashing the presidency for leading a very sluggish start. While supporters of President Muhammadu Buhari are yet to substantially defend his proposals, it could rightly be argued that first 100 Days have never guaranteed the success of an entire tenure, neither have early process complications necessitated failure in governance. However,   every voyage starts with one step – thanks to Franklin D. Roosevelt, a United States President who in 1933, used his first three months in office to lay the foundations of his executive mandate. Ever since this year, the First 100 Days have been seen as a unique moment in predicting proposal efficacy and tenure effectiveness.

President Buhari’s case is strange, because his regime is still confused about governance, and at the worst, waterlogged by the demands of a transformation process it professed.  Supported by his ruling party cohorts, President Buhari has been terribly astounded by his own campaign proposals – grappling with how and where to start, and denying the very promises he made to the masses just a few months ago.

A hundred days or not, the troubling issue is that President Buhari’s accomplishments so far has been a horrendous nightmare. In an authoritarian manner, constitutional measures are swiftly dwindling into unrestrained anarchy. As it was noted in this column a few weeks ago, in the world’s political history, Nigeria stands to become the only country where an elected President ferociously assumed the position of the Vice President, Chief Prosecutor, Prison Director, Chief Judge, Petroleum Chief – then sits down on the constitution with unrestrained supremacy, cold-shouldering the other sectors of the government.

From the very start of his executive directives, President Buhari has gone gaga with the most significant issues in the country’s politics – security, economy, and corruption. Regrettably, an assessment of his handle of these issues so far indicates that the country is once again back to dictatorship. For instance, on security, he had quickly replaced the service chiefs; moved Nigeria’s defense command unit to Maiduguri, claiming the idea was to ease up a counter strategy against the terror group. But critics differ, accusing Buhari of conferring greater political power opportunities to his Northern allies, and restructuring the military system to protect that structure.

To further frustrate a global support of a fight against the Boko Haram, the Buhari regime was scandalously exposed for secretly granting an entry visa to a fleeing ‘ISIS Emir’, and a Lebanese fugitive, Ahmad al-Assir who was later arrested. He was trying to escape to Nigeria through Cairo with fake Palestinian travel document in a scenario that questions the Buhari’s credibility in fighting terror. While a possible collaboration between Assir and the Buhar’s regime was being investigated, Buhari’s advocacy for a Boko Haram amnesty created additional doubts over his request for assistance from the United States in fighting terror, leaving the regime all confused and helpless in meeting its security proposals to defend the country.
b47589787edf50532662454361040989
In less than a hundred days,  Buhari has thrown the country’s economy into harm’s way, singlehandedly presiding changes that signals a fiscal doom. He had enforced a mass worker retrenchment, sending close to 100, 000 out of jobs. He had banned the recruitment of federal public sector workers, raised interest rates, and halted capital projects at all governmental levels. Without any official protocol, President Buhari had dictatorially suspended the upgrade projects at the Calabar/Onne seaports, ordered a slash in federal allocation to states, and canceled the second Niger bridge project, attributing his action to one single phrase, “War against corruption.”

Foreign investors and major global financial institutions have openly expressed concerns about the direction of the Nigerian economy. Last week, JPMorgan Chase & Co. disqualified Nigeria from its local-currency emerging-market bond indexes, after restrictions on foreign-exchange transactions prompted investor concerns about a shortage of liquidity. But, the defiant president remained untouched about his belt-tightening policy, and in fact announced a proposal to shut down some embassies and foreign mission abroad. Another action that could put additional thousands of federal employees out of their jobs by last quarter of the year.

Just like his handle of the economy and matters of security, the regime’s vows to tackle corruption remain another shocking blow. In sheer irony, Buhari personally has been caught up reconciling issues of fraud directly involving his interests. For instance, the immediate former governor of the oil rich Rivers State, Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi is facing accusations of funding Buhari’s Campaign with stolen state funds amounting to more than 70 billion Naira. Amaechi allegedly fraudulently sold state-owned   power plants and made mistrustful transfer of $105 million (N21, 000,000,000) from the Power Asset Sale Proceeds Account to accounts owned by private companies.

Consequently, the General was alleged to have personally pleaded with the former President and one of the targets of his proposed probe, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo who vowed to release a dossier of documents linking him (Buhari), his wife, daughter, and key allies in his administration to major fraud related to various affairs of the government. To appease the aged former leader, President Buhari quickly retracted  his threats, announcing publicly that he would not extend his corruption probe beyond the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan. Today, Buhari’s drive to curb fraud has yielded nothing besides indiscriminate arrests of selected individuals whom he had targeted for retributive reasons.

While President Buhari, a former dictator, flip-flops with official duties in a representative system unfamiliar to his individual capacity, his appointed media activists have been busy showcasing him with falsehood and deception. To substitute for a total lack of responses for his regime catastrophe, the APC media combatants have polluted the social media with fake stories about the Buhari’s accomplishments. Yet, the regime’s major damage remains Buhari’s total disconnection with both his subordinates in the government, party colleagues, and the masses. In his signature tyrannical fashion, Buhari has remained the only arm of the system, whereas his supporters chokingly struggle in the social media to defend  the vagueness of his stewardship. Shamelessly, the Sai-Buhari profile-glorification jingle has totally expired in obscurity, leaving his media handlers redundant and clueless about their a woeful in defending mediocrity.

Nigeria’s new regime – a decree of anarchy

Governmental events in Nigeria is swiftly drawing the country closer to unrestrained anarchy. In world’s political history, Nigeria has now

By Anthony Obi Ogbo
By Anthony Obi Ogbo

becomes the only country where an elected President ferociously assumed the position of the Vice President, Chief Prosecutor, Prison Director, Chief Judge, Petroleum Chief – then sits down on the constitution with unchallenged authority, undermining the powers of other segments of the government.

President Muhammadu Buhari’s  current turbulent marriage with Nigeria is not new, and in fact represents a bizarre homecoming. As an army major general,  Buhari dealt with Nigerians as a dictator from 1983 through 1985 in a nightmarish retributive rule, where he projected himself like a Roman god and ruled like the Taliban.

He  relied heavily on decrees and special tribunals to regulate communal life and chastised a selection of law offenders with a killer- axe.  Subjective orders and decrees were his only governance tools, and as of July 1984, Buhari had promulgated as much as twenty-two decrees, radiating widespread controversies and international condemnation. He subjugated the judiciary with special military tribunals, whereas the state security agency, the National Security Organization, was accorded greater powers. These were in the mid-80s.

Today, over two months in office, Buhari has not changed, and might have even gotten worse.  He has assumed a dictatorship role, and deceitfully claimed to be too busy to name a working team. Yet, he had the time to make multiple trips to countries in Europe, America, and Africa, bringing back no development strategies but stacks of photo albums for image campaign.

Worse, this President while undermining the constitutional process, single handedly made key appointments, including a restructure of  his nation’s intelligence and military system. He had ordered several arrests of presumably past political foes, and commandingly moved detained terror-suspects on trial around different prisons outside their judicial precincts. He has no clue about how to handle a democracy, but sits down in an undisclosed secluded government location and issued orders by the hours.ba40aeb5867d36c9a6c9abd442f5ee21

The worst damage of Buhari’s approach to issues of governance is a total disconnection with both his subordinates in the government, party colleagues, and the masses. Buhari has remained the only arm of the system, whereas his supporters chokingly struggle in the social media to defend  a regime that jumpstarted into action without any platform. Consequently, the Sai-Buhari mantra has totally died in the public domain leaving only a few voices who stood back to save face.

Nigeria is not looking too good at the moment, and the truth is that the regime has been busy celebrating failures and lying to the masses about the disconnection of their Commander-in-Chief with both his subordinates and the masses: his sightlessness to issues of governance, including a total disrespect to the rule of law. The worst failure is a failure before a beginning and Buhari has demonstrated that ineptitude. As a remedy, the new leader may consider, as a beginning, reconciling issues with his first major obstacle – himself.

Nigeria: How does Buhari’s 50% pay cut Crack Terror?

By Anthony Obi Ogbo
By Anthony Obi Ogbo

In the past five weeks, Boko Haram militants have slaughtered villagers and bombed churches and mosques in the northern Nigeria, challenging president Muhammadu Buhari’s vows to clean the region of any terrorist insurgency in the first few months of his administration. To make it worse, the group has boldly overrun Borno State, a region where  President Buhari relocated the country’s armory, with an excuse to defeat them. So what went wrong?

Just last week, frustrated Nigerians took to media outlets to question President Buhari’s nonchalant attitude toward issues of security and economy. He had remained out of touch with realities of the governmental process and had not offered a single plan as to how to begin.   Food prices are on the increase; Fuel pump price has increased from N87/liter to varying prices of between N110 to N130 per liter. Exchange is on a scary increase of $1 = N230 contrary to Buhari’s promise to eliminate differences in exchange rates.

Amidst all these difficulties and of course the regime’s inability to communicate a development outline, the president finally broke his 40-day silence on national issues. It was an announcement meant to positively inspire hope in a system currently lifeless. To his hopeless suffering masses, President Buhari handed down his announcement, that he would only receive half of the salary paid to his predecessor. Who cares? The annual salary of the Nigerian president is currently set at 14,058,820 naira ($70,000), including allowances, and the commonsense question is how a voluntary pay cut by this president could alleviate the current economic woes?

Yet it is worrisome that rather than tackle major issues, the social media warriors of the All Progressive Congress (APC) have continued to feed disappointed masses with some worthless cock-and-bull tales about President Buhari’s acclaimed modesty, cheap maintenance, and low-level lifestyle. Press releases are either how he turned down an official car, or how he flew the economy class.

But observers are very worried about this self-gratifying campaign. In a region overrun by Islamic extremists and terrorists, the major issue should be how a 50% pay-cut could crack terror.  Buhari’s supporters claim that his pay-cut would likely put pressure on members of the parliament and state governors to do the same, but how this attitude addresses a skyrocketing unemployment rates is yet to be ascertained. Furthermore, with continual global slump in the price of crude oil which is Nigeria’s major source of revenue,  the government must render a figurative analysis on how pay-cuts could build the economy.

Challenges in government are inevitable:  addressing them should be a strategic duty, not a punitive labor.  One positive aspect of failure is that success thrives on it. Every country has that moment – a period when challenges engulf growth and possibilities. This is when policy-making effectiveness becomes obligatory, and the Chief Executive takes the lead in coordinating two significant elements of his duties, the general masses and the surrounding situation or context. A leader who neither understands nor speaks this language should back off and become a follower.

President Buhari....Electioneering campaign is over, and by now, the APC must abstain from feeding hungry masses with fake rhetoric and deceits about President Buhari’s sanctimonious lifestyle.
President Buhari….Electioneering campaign is over, and by now, the APC must abstain from feeding hungry masses with fake rhetoric and deceits about President Buhari’s sanctimonious lifestyle.

 

When president Obama came into office in 2008, the economy of the United States was in shambles. He named his team, presented America with a blue print, and communicated projected timelines. He spoke to the masses regularly through radio/TV speeches, social media chats, emails, and other outlets, expressing the desolations of the tide and his keenness to inspire change and convey hope into the populace. In January 2009 alone, employers cut nearly 800,000 workers. Throughout 2009, the job slashing continued until the unemployment rate hit 10 percent that October. Within four years, the unemployment rate went down to 5.6 percent, and at some point, the private-sector employers added jobs for 58 straight months — the longest streak on record.

One of President Obama’s economic nightmare inherited from his predecessor was the housing catastrophe. The brutal foreclosure crisis knocked millions out of their homes, and by 2010, the “serious” delinquency rate for mortgages hit 4.2 percent, leaving millions of homeowners behind on their payments. Following Obama’s blueprint, the delinquency rate was down to 1.9 percent while the housing prices rebounded.

Back to Nigeria and the  prevalent standoff between them administration and the masses on policymaking blackout, nobody is expecting a miracle from a regime that has barely lasted for two months, but with its customary lack of communication regarding projects’ plans and timelines, the Buhari’s regime may be headed for a process blackout.  Without Ministers; not a single known adviser, and without any working team besides some obsequious cohorts who worship him, President Buhari is already abusing his official duties, making contradictory policy comments, dictating unmanageable strategy undertakings, and flip-flopping with dire issues of national significance. For instance, without senate approval President Buhari had unilaterally granted over N780 billion to States without a signed document from an operational minister of finance.  While the APC bragged about the president turning down official cars and presidential jets, Buhari has unilaterally approved, and have started a construction of a private helipad in Daura Katsina State, his home town.

Electioneering campaign is over, and by now, the APC must abstain from feeding hungry masses with fake rhetoric and deceits about President Buhari’s sanctimonious lifestyle. It is not late for this President to communicate his agenda and acquaint the populace with his plans to proceed. Self-gratifying tales about taking pay cuts, turning down official cars, declining state dinner engagements, and so on are absolutely irrelevant to the current challenges. If his 50% pay cut has any positive impact on this country’s alarming unemployment rates; skyrocketing food and petrol pump prices; and his inability to form a government – he should provide an outline to communicate his claims. The poor masses are saturated with pointless campaign on Buhari’s holier-than-thou personality. This is the time to show his executive skills and so far, he has flunked that test.

Buhari: Executive Stalemate

By Anthony Obi Ogbo
By Anthony Obi Ogbo

Unable to choose his working team,  President Muhammadu Buhari has been struggling to kick-off a regime he bragged so much about. The All Progressives Congress APC, it may be recalled, ran an electioneering race projecting their candidate, now the president, as a fiscally astute conservative who would curb corruption and appropriately manage the country’s economic and financial resources. The masses at this time are getting something entirely different.

While Buhari, a former dictator backflips with official duties in a representative system unfamiliar to his individual aptitude, his camp has been busy showcasing him with falsehood and deceptive fairy tales. To substitute for total lack of answers for his regime catastrophe, the APC social media warriors have been feeding disappointed masses with some worthless cock-and-bull tales of what is now termed the ‘Buhari Wonders.”

The first fake story to justify Buhari’s humility, and considerateness to money matters came during the government transition period, when the APC claimed that predecessor, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan presented a billion naira budget for delegates’ lunch, but Buhari the “good money-manager” declined any expenses, saying that his transition team would bring their own lunch. Meanwhile this president was in London at the time on a controversial mission not properly communicated to his constituents.

A similar story yet made it to the network from the Buhari’s camp on how  during the South Africa’s trip, Buhari paid the hotel bills for his staff, and asked the rest of the entourage to pay their own bills. This was a president yet to name a single staff till date. The propaganda continued with another rumor that hundreds of politicians, including the Petroleum Minister, Alison-Madueke had returned billions of Dollars stolen from the government – because they were afraid of Buhari the “respected honest money-keeper” and disciplinarian.

It is despicable that at this crucial time in the regime,  the APC social media ensemble, running out of Buhari praise-worship songs are busy telling self-indulgent stories including comparing Buhari and Jonathan’s cars, use of presidential jets, Buhari’s choice of transportation, and ostensibly his suya flavor. But  how long would they continue to feed the masses with these tommyrots.

As I write, the Buhari’s camp in the social media are still tagging around senseless stories about Buhari opting to fly in the economy class over first class; or choosing Okada over official convoy; or proposing to be eating on the floor instead of an official dining table; or heading to Alhaji Suya bacteria for his inauguration dinner rather than the traditional Aso-Rock in-house executive banquet.

Major questions remain – when would Nigerians start  getting substantial information about the running of the government? Where are the ‘missing girls’? When is this ‘change’ going to start? Where is the unemployment salaries? Where are Buhari’s ministers? Who has been making all decisions so far? Is this still a democracy?BuhariHR convoy

Indeed, Buhari and those who bejeweled him into his current executive predicament have been facing a more complicated political landscape. Even as  Buhari announced as a terror-defense strategy, a relocation of the country’s armory to Borno State, Nigeria has remained under a terrorist attacks.  In fact, last Monday suicide bombing  at a crowded fish market occurred in the northeastern city of Maiduguri – the same region where the regime relocated its arsenal.
Let us be clear then – that a president chose a wheelbarrow as an official car does not make him morally decent and fiscally astute; it only exposes his ignorance to issues of fiscal policies.  Buhari, and indeed his Yahoo drum-beaters should explain their frameworks and preparedness to fiscal reformation. They should tell Nigerians how the regime can sustain in the long run, the existing spending, policies, and tax – without jeopardizing Nigeria’s creditworthiness, obligations or projected expenses.

Without Ministers; not a single known adviser, and without any working team besides obsequious cohorts who worship him, President Buhari is already abusing his official duties, making contradictory policy comments, dictating unmanageable strategy undertakings, and flip-flopping with dire issues of national significance.

As a matter of urgency, the masses are waiting for their new president to at least acquaint them with his plans to proceed. They want to hear about the machinery to translate electoral promises into action, not about limousines, and jets. In a government structure where the President cannot communicate, cannot relate, and worse, cannot corroborate his own policies, there is every reason to worry. It is torturing that under the current regime,   citizens have to rely on repentant party bloggers to know the fate of their current economic woes.

x Close

Like Us On Facebook